Same prompt. Three agents.
Real answers.
Every agent has strengths and blind spots. The only way to know which one handles your specific codebase best is to run them head-to-head on real tasks, not synthetic benchmarks.
Deep reasoning, thorough refactors
Fast iteration, broad context
Git-native, diff-focused workflow
The problem
You read a blog post saying Agent X is the best. You try it on your monorepo and it chokes on your custom build system. You switch to Agent Y, but now you've lost the context of what X produced. Evaluating agents one at a time is slow and you never get a clean comparison.
With Agent Grids
Open a 1x3 grid. Point each tile at the same repo directory. Paste the same prompt into Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and Aider. Watch them work simultaneously. Compare the diffs, the approaches, and the time to completion side-by-side. Form your own opinion based on your actual code.
Why side-by-side matters
Benchmarks test generic tasks. Your codebase is not generic. An agent that scores well on HumanEval might struggle with your specific framework conventions, test patterns, or build tooling. The only benchmark that matters is performance on your own work.
Agent Grids doesn't pick favorites. It supports any CLI-based agent. Run two, three, or more in parallel and let the results speak.
Find your best agent
Start with two free terminals. Upgrade to unlimited for $29 -- one-time, lifetime license.
Download Free